Boreal forests provide a wealth of ecosystem services, many of which are linked to forest productivity. Climate change is expected to increase the frequency, duration, and severity of drought, and undermine the productivity of western boreal forests. Favouring species mixtures has emerged as a potential strategy to increase forest resilience to drought. To test the hypothesis that mixtures of trembling aspen and white spruce were more productive than pure stands because they were more resistant and resilient to drought, we analyzed community and species responses to drought utilizing measurements of annual growth obtained from stem disc samples from a planted field experiment. The experiment, established in 1999, included pure aspen, aspen dominated mixtures, equal mixtures, spruce dominated mixtures, and pure spruce in a randomized block design. In 2020, trees were harvested, and annual basal area increment was estimated from measurements of stem discs. We retrospectively studied the response of productivity to strong droughts in 2009 and 2015 by defining pre- and post-drought growth periods and calculating drought resistance (drought/pre-drought) and resilience (post-drought/pre-drought). Our results support the hypothesis that mixtures are both more productive and resilient to drought than pure stands. Composition significantly influenced the three resilience components for spruce, but effects on aspen were limited. Community mortality was greatest in pure spruce, followed by pure aspen. For mixtures, community productivity increased with the proportion of spruce; and pure spruce exhibited the lowest basal area, with less than half the basal area value than the other compositions. These findings indicate that overall favouring mixed stands is a more suitable strategy for enhancing forest resilience to drought. These results provide insight into the importance of managing, aspen-spruce mixtures under expected drought as a result of climate change.